Artifical intelligence and personalized learning experiences
*The following article is a research proposal and outlines the need for further research in this field
Written By: Andres Reis Couto
Abstract
This research proposal investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in facilitating personalized learning experiences in educational settings while addressing the associated ethical implications. Rapid advancements in AI offer promising possibilities for customizing and optimizing learning experiences, though its utilization remains underexplored. Furthermore, AI's ethical challenges in education, such as algorithmic fairness and transparency, require a comprehensive examination. This study thus aims to investigate AI-driven tools in educational settings, identify best practices, examine the ethical implications and propose a regulatory framework, bridging the gap between the ideal and reality of personalized learning, providing a more nuanced understanding of the ethical aspects of AI in education.
Key terms: Artificial Intelligence, Personalized Learning, Education, Ethical Implications.
Introduction
The recent rapid advancement of artificial intelligence technologies presents new possibilities across various sectors, including education. Despite the ubiquity of technology in contemporary classrooms, the potential of AI to customize and optimize learning experiences for each student is still under-explored and under-utilized. Educational researchers have often highlighted the pressing need for personalization and adaptability to cater to individual learners' unique learning styles, paces, and preferences (Pane et al.; El-Sabagh). However, the current one-size-fits-all pedagogical approach still prevails in many educational contexts, largely due to the limitations of traditional teaching methods that cannot individualize learning effectively (Mead). Moreover, many ethical dilemmas AI presents in education, such as algorithmic fairness, transparency, accountability, and equity, lack a thorough examination, even though some have begun to be addressed (Bowen, UNESCO, OECD).
The research at hand comes at a critical juncture, aiming to leverage the power of AI to bridge the gap between the ideal and reality of personalized learning while also confronting and offering solutions to the ethical implications associated with AI use in education. The central research question of this study is: "How can AI be effectively and ethically implemented in educational contexts to provide personalized learning experiences?” To answer this question, the study has the following specific aims:
● Investigate various AI-driven tools and their applications within educational settings to understand their adaptability to the individual needs of learners.
● Identify best tools and practices and offer recommendations for AI implementation within educational contexts.
● Scrutinize the ethical implications of AI use in education and propose a regulatory framework.
Literature Review
The application of AI in education is an emerging research area that has garnered significant interest among experts in computer science, education, and psychology (McNamee). A seminal work by Baker and Yacef in 2009 identified the potential of AI to adapt to individual learners' requirements and styles. While their work provided an early foundational understanding of AI's potential in fostering learner-centric systems, they emphasized the need for more sophisticated algorithms to augment the learning process further, thus illuminating a research path that this study will expand upon. The evolution of AI has been exponential since then, with recent studies corroborating the early hypothesis of AI's efficacy in education. Anuyahong et al.'s 2023 exploration of AI in education affirms Baker and Yacef's foresight, attesting that AI-fueled systems can indeed enhance student engagement and facilitate personalized learning experiences. Research commissioned by Microsoft demonstrates the consensus among educators that AI will be instrumental in shaping the future of education, with 99.4% stating that it will be crucial for their institution's competitiveness within the next three years. Furthermore, 92% of institutions have begun experimenting with AI technologies, indicating an eagerness to explore the potential of AI in education . However, the study also reveals that most institutions still lack a clear AI strategy, suggesting the need for more research and guidance on effectively implementing AI in educational contexts (Ayoub) . This research aims to tackle this problem directly by offering versatile recommendations for AI implementation within educational contexts.
Ethically, the necessity for AI to be inclusive and equitable is recognized. However, a significant deficit is found in the rigorous exploration of algorithmic bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, and the effect on interpersonal relationships in the educational setting. In 2021, UNESCO established recommendations on the ethics of AI. However, shortcomings were identified, like a lack of prioritization, clarity, and overlapping recommendations (Global Partners Digital). The field needs further study, particularly in developing a comprehensive, versatile regulatory framework adaptive to the rapid technological strides—a gap this study aims to bridge. By scrutinizing these ethical implications and proposing a comprehensive regulatory framework, this research expands on the current discourse and seeks to provide a more nuanced understanding of AI's ethical aspects in education.
Methodology
Investigating AI-Driven Tools in Education: The study will comprehensively review primary and secondary literature to examine various tools and their applications in educational settings. This review will include academic research papers, industry reports, and case studies featuring successful applications of AI in education. From this, general subjective metrics like multi-regional implementation, recognition in the field, contemporary relevance, demonstrated success and widespread use will be used as an initial way to narrow the scope of the best AI-driven tools to around 10. Next, extensive information on each tool will be gathered using the following methods: collaborating with educational institutions already implementing AI in their curriculum to obtain primary real-world data; utilizing public AI datasets from sources like the UCI Machine Learning Repository and Kaggle for hands-on experimentation; and conducting surveys and interviews with educators and students to gather qualitative feedback on the effectiveness and usability of the identified AI-driven tools.
Identifying Best Tools and Practices and Offering Suggestions for AI Implementation in Education: The study will establish an objective criterion using the wealth of data collected in the initial phase. These will weigh quantitative factors such as user engagement, student score difference, scalability, accuracy, reliability and adaptability alongside qualitative information such as user satisfaction, teacher feedback, inclusivity, relevance and impact on learning motivation. Each criterion will be scored on a scale of 1-10. This evaluation will enable the researchers to pinpoint the best overall AI tools in education. Furthermore, case studies will be analyzed, and potentially, the teaching-learning process in selected institutions using these AI tools will be observed to understand their practical use and effectiveness. The findings from the analysis of best practices will then be used to formulate actionable suggestions for AI implementation in education. Unique educational contexts will be considered, ensuring that the suggestions are flexible to accommodate a variety of scenarios. A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis of the suggested practices in different settings (urban and rural, affluent and low-income, different curriculum systems, etc.) will be conducted to anticipate potential hurdles and develop solutions.
Scrutinizing Ethical Implications of AI in Education and Proposing a Regulatory Framework: The researchers will conduct a comprehensive literature review and look to build on existing ethical guidelines and frameworks related to AI, such as UNESCO's global AI ethics standards and the OECD AI Principles. Interviews and surveys will be conducted with educators, students and parents from different backgrounds to gain a diverse perspective on the ethical implications of AI in education. Issues such as algorithmic fairness, transparency, accountability, data privacy, and the impact of AI on teacher-student relationships will be scrutinized. The outcomes will be used to propose a universal regulatory framework adaptive to fast technological advancements. This framework will focus on protecting the rights and interests of students and educators, promoting transparency and fairness, and ensuring that AI tools enhance rather than hinder the learning experience.
Works Cited
Anuyahong, Bundit, et al. “Analyzing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning and Adaptive Assessment in Higher Education.” International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, vol. X, no. IV, 2023, pp. 88–93, www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-10-issue-4/88-93.pdf
Ayoub, Dan. “Unleashing the Power of AI for Education.” MIT Technology Review, 4 Mar. 2020, www.technologyreview.com/2020/03/04/905535/unleashing-the-power-of-ai-for-education/.
Blikstein, Paulo. “Using Learning Analytics to Assess Students’ Behavior in Open-Ended Programming Tasks.” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge -LAK ’11, 2011, at.doit.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/LA-Stanford-Blikstein_SFLAK2011CodingStrategies.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090132. Accessed 7 Feb. 2022.
Bowen, Janine. “3 Things K-12 Educators Should Know about the Ethics and Use of AI in Education.” College of Education News, 27 Feb. 2023, ced.ncsu.edu/news/2023/02/27/3-things-k-12-educators-should-know-about-the-ethics-and-use-of-ai-in-education/.
El-Sabagh, Hassan A. “Adaptive E-Learning Environment Based on Learning Styles and Its Impact on Development Students’ Engagement.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 1, 1 Oct. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4.
Gauthier, Andrea, et al. Responsible AI in Education: Policy, Principles, Design, and Implementation |Frontiers Research Topic. 2022, www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/29997/responsible-ai-in-education-policy-principles-designand-implementation#authors.
Global Partners Digital. “UNESCO’s Draft Recommendation on Ethics and AI: Our Thoughts | Global Partners Digital.” Global Partners Digital, 30 Apr. 2021, www.gp-digital.org/unescos-draft-recommendation-on-ethics-and-ai-our-thoughts/.
Kulik, James A., and J. D. Fletcher. “Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review.” SAGE Publications, Mar. 2016. McNamee, Erica.
“AI and Education Meet in Interdisciplinary Research.” Engineering Education and AI-Augmented Learning IRT, 28 Sept. 2021, www.colorado.edu/irt/engineering-education-ai/2021/09/28/ai-and-education-meet-interdisciplinary-research.
Mead, Sarah. “Differentiated Learning: Why “One Size Fits All” Doesn’t Work in Education.” Whitbyschool.org, 2018, www.whitbyschool.org/passionforlearning/differentiated-learning-why-one-size-fits-all-doesntwork-in-education.
OECD. “The OECD Artificial Intelligence (AI) Principles.” Oecd.ai, 2019, oecd.ai/en/ai-principles.
Pane, John F, et al. “How Does Personalized Learning Affect Student Achievement?”: Rand.org, RAND Corporation, 2017, www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9994.html.
Pane, John F., et al. Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. ERIC, RAND Corporation, 1 Nov. 2015, eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571009.
Ryan S.J.D Baker, and Kalina Yacef. “The State of Educational Data Mining in 2009: A Review and Future Visions.” JEDM | Journal of Educational Data Mining, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 3–17, jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM/article/view/8.
UNESCO. “Artificial Intelligence in Education | UNESCO.” www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/artificial-intelligence.
“UNESCO Adopts First Global Standard on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence.” Unesco.org, 2021, www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-adopts-first-global-standard-ethics-artificial-intelligence.
Weller, Martin. “25 Years of Ed Tech.” Feb. 2020.
